🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.